Comments on: Little Annoyances: Mail.app http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/ Simplicity is complicated. Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:56:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Derik http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1784 Derik Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:54:34 +0000 http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1784 Ack, that's weird. Ack, that’s weird.

]]> By: dAVE http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1783 dAVE Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:17:53 +0000 http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1783 Derik: in the case you mention my smtp server should accept such an email.. and I would find out I had made a mistake when I get an undeliverable notice later. In this case the message never went out! Much more frustrating ;-) Derik: in the case you mention my smtp server should accept such an email.. and I would find out I had made a mistake when I get an undeliverable notice later.

In this case the message never went out! Much more frustrating ;-)

]]> By: Derik http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1782 Derik Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:11:09 +0000 http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1782 Actually, just the domain name (foo.com for example) could be a valid username and in some smtp systems, just the username is allowable as the current domain will be assumed. Therefore looking for an at sign doesn't always make sense. Actually, just the domain name (foo.com for example) could be a valid username and in some smtp systems, just the username is allowable as the current domain will be assumed. Therefore looking for an at sign doesn’t always make sense.

]]> By: dAVE http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1781 dAVE Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:35:40 +0000 http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1781 I have Mail version Version 2.0.5 (746/746.2). Is there a newer version if I upgrade to 10.4.4? It's important to note that I am not using the preview pane at the bottom of the window, I closed it completely. I can only read mail by double-clicking a message. If Apple fixed it in 10.4.4 I'll be upgrading right away!!! Cheers, dAVE I have Mail version Version 2.0.5 (746/746.2). Is there a newer version if I upgrade to 10.4.4?

It’s important to note that I am not using the preview pane at the bottom of the window, I closed it completely. I can only read mail by double-clicking a message.

If Apple fixed it in 10.4.4 I’ll be upgrading right away!!!

Cheers,

dAVE

]]> By: earthsaver http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1780 earthsaver Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:54:45 +0000 http://www.theconsultant.net/archives/2006/02/12/little-annoyances-mailapp/#comment-1780 Um. Dave: the current version of Mail does allow us to space through messages exactly in the way you describe. Pressing space pages down if possible in the currently displayed message and jumps to the next message when it can no longer. What version are you using? Um. Dave: the current version of Mail does allow us to space through messages exactly in the way you describe. Pressing space pages down if possible in the currently displayed message and jumps to the next message when it can no longer. What version are you using?

]]>